A Safe Space to Heal: Balancing Safety and Comfort in Behavioral Health Design

Like any other healthcare facility, behavioral health environments must be comforting places to heal. But these spaces pose unique considerations to keep patients safe, requiring thoughtful balance from skilled design professionals to create environments that are beautiful and manage patient risk. Senior Interior Designer Lauren Frank, Senior Project Manager Susan Golberg, and Senior Architect Ellen Konerza are a few members of the BWBR team who work to design these facilities, and in the latest episode of Side of Design, they dive in to creating environments that prioritize safety without feeling cold or institutional.

Evaluating Risk

Behavioral health facilities are complex environments, with many different factors to consider – balancing safety guidelines and aesthetics, customizing layouts to facilitate staff operations, and evaluating the potential risks in any given space. One important tool to help designers manage the complexities is the Behavioral Health Design Guide, a living document that classifies different areas of a facility from 1 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk). “[The Guide] represents the leading current industry practices for these environments, and it’s a practical means for designers to make sure the spaces are protecting the patients and the staff from harm,” explains Ellen. The guidelines are informed by organizations like the Facility Guidelines Institute (FGI) and Veteran’s Affairs (VA) to address the built environment for adult inpatient behavioral health units.

Level one areas are not accessible by patients, such as staff breakrooms, where standard fixtures are acceptable. Level two encompasses rooms with heavy staff supervision, while level three is considered the baseline for most patient areas – lounges, dining areas, and other areas that are open, visible, and have less intensive supervision fall under this level. Rooms where a patient can be alone, like bedrooms and bathrooms, are considered level four, and the highest level is seen in spaces where patients may be experiencing high stress or agitation, such as intake areas or seclusion rooms.

“These levels guide everything from ceiling heights to furniture choices,” says Susan. Ligature resistance is one of the biggest factors in behavioral health design, but elements like acoustical treatments, spatial density, and clear wayfinding also contribute to safety and risk.

Customized Criteria

While an extremely important tool for designers, these guidelines aren’t hard-and-fast rules – they’re a baseline to be customized to the unique needs of each client and their patient population. Since the criteria only address general adult units, different age groups and treatment specializations may have more or less intensive needs than what is outlined in the guide. Staff may also employ risk mitigation strategies in their operations that reduce certain design needs. “The only way to hear about those risks is from the staff who work with the patients in that unit. So, their voices are really important in every decision,” says Ellen.

Potential risks to child and adolescent patients vary greatly from risks to adult or geriatric patients. “For instance, you can imagine someone younger running down a long hallway and with the ceiling height – if it’s just nine feet– it’s easy to jump and pop that ceiling tile up,” Ellen explains. “Geriatric patients probably wouldn’t be popping those ceiling tiles up.” Every decision matters, and it’s critical that each design element is selected thoughtfully and strategically.

Particularly for facilities receiving reimbursements for Medicare or Medicaid, requiring surveys by the Joint Commission, documentation of risk mitigation is crucial: “It’s a good diagrammatical tool to be able to say these are the different spaces, and these are the risk levels based on how the clients have described their patients using the unit,” says Lauren. “If the Joint Commission comes, they have a diagram and document to back up why decisions were made and why room types are designed the way they are.”

Going Beyond the Baseline

With the need for secure, ligature-resistant environments, one of the biggest challenges in behavioral health design is creating a safe space without feeling institutional or punitive.

“We need to be creating a therapeutic healing environment. We don’t want to have the space defeat the patient before they walk in,” says Susan. “It’s a balancing act. We’ll never be able to get any place risk-free but we do want to try to reduce risk.”

This balance extends to every aspect of design, from the overall layout to the smallest details. Sometimes, modifying the criteria is worth the reward. Susan provides an example of selecting lay-in ceilings rather than hard-lid ceilings, which are typically recommended at heights under ten feet due to ligature risk. Tiled lay-in ceilings, though, offer better acoustics. In a case such as a group therapy room with ceilings under ten feet, “staff may decide it’s more important that they have the acoustics for the therapeutic elements of the space, and the space is supervised so they’ll take on that risk,” she explains.

Lauren points out the importance of making spaces “home-like and calming, bringing nature in so that it feels welcoming, inviting… like a place where you could get better.” The designers utilize Human-Centered Safety, BWBR’s holistic, integrated design approach to behavioral spaces where safety is priority, but not at the expense of patient dignity and choice. The result is environments where families can feel confident and comfortable bringing a loved one to, and where patients feel welcomed and safe upon arrival.

An Ever-Evolving Field

The field of behavioral health design is constantly evolving, driven by new research, changing standards, and product innovations. Lauren highlights the New York State Office of Mental Health guide, which is regularly updated with new product evaluations.

“Different vendors are constantly coming up with new ligature-resistant products that we can then bring to our clients to have them test and provide feedback on,” Lauren explains. These first-hand accounts allow the team to apply valuable experience to new projects, bringing solutions that have been tried and tested in similar environments.

The team also discusses how, as research continues, new safety concerns can be discovered in products that were previously recommended by guides. Replacing these products may be costly, but ultimately improves patient safety by eliminating known risks. Because of the fast-paced innovations in behavioral health spaces, it’s all the more important that BWBR team members stay on top of the latest recommendations for risk mitigation. This way, they can help clients make strategic, informed decisions to reduce major costs and construction down the road.

In the end, the goal is to create spaces that do more than meet the minimum requirements for safety. By blending deep understanding of risks with compassionate design, behavioral health environments can be truly therapeutic and healing environments, making a lasting impact for patients and their families while allowing staff to deliver effective care.

Choose Your Own Adventure: Strategic Lab Design for Your Unique Priorities

 As science and technology evolve at rapid speeds, lab design trends are naturally following suit. As part of a presentation about our experiences navigating these developments to the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Laboratory Committee in August 2024, our team surveyed attendees to rank which trends they consider most critical to their operations. After all, if everything is priority, then nothing is, and being able to focus energy and resources where they will most impact your organization is key.

Here’s how the AWWA folks ranked their responses:

We’ll walk through all eight below, since needs and existing conditions will vary for every lab environment, but we believe every lab can benefit from strategic design.

1. Spaces That Satisfy

With their strict cleanliness and durability requirements, laboratories often have a reputation for being dark, cold, or institutional. Yet, as places where innovation prospers, their design should reflect the inspiring research and development conducted in them.

  • Attracting and retaining scientists is a major conversation in both public and corporate laboratories, which requires labs to not only be functional but also visually pleasing, enjoyable workplaces.
  • Natural daylight boosts mood, productivity, and wellbeing, and its absence is one of the biggest factors that can decrease satisfaction among employees. Window placement is a critical consideration in the planning process, especially in relation to equipment and storage that require unobstructed wall space.
  • Carefully selected finishes like bright paint, wood tones, or patterned floor materials bring warmth while meeting cleaning and durability standards inside a lab space. Visibility between labs and adjacent spaces also allows for design elements that don’t meet laboratory requirements to still impact a lab’s overall feel.
  • Ergonomics and personal control matter and should be considered when designing casework, lighting, and HVAC systems.

2. Blending Flexible and Fixed

As both budgets and square footage become tighter, every space in a facility needs to do more – labs must be future-proof and quick to respond to changing regulations and processes. Because of this, we’re seeing a trend towards minimizing fixed elements in order to improve adaptability to changes in staff, instrumentation, and operations.

  • Typically, a blend of fixed and flexible is the most effective route, with the level of adaptability geared to the processes happening in individual lab spaces.
  • Flexible components can also be added to fixed structures, such as adjustable shelving in fixed casework or mobile cabinets underneath fixed countertops.
  • Flexibility does come with a cost premium – most often, clients demand a level of flexibility appropriate to the process and set up easy future adaptation without paying for total flexibility on day one.

3. Safe and Secure

Lab work can unfortunately become politicized, as we saw during pandemic. Thoughtful security measures have become a necessity to increase staff comfort, protect confidential work, and address threats to physical safety.

  • Although guided public access can be a benefit to facilities, lines of security must be delineated and understood by building occupants, as well as law enforcement or security services.
  • Levels of badging can vary depending on security needs – in some labs, all staff may be able to access the scientific corridor, while highly secure organizations may prefer to utilize different levels of badging or card readers for each lab area.
  • In labs that operate 24/7, staff safety while arriving and leaving late at night should be prioritized through consideration of parking distance, lighting, and sightlines.

4. Building a Sustainable Future

  • As the most expensive spaces to heat and cool, optimizing lab square footage matters. When organizations deeply understand the needs of their facilities, designers can avoid over-conditioning excess square footage.
  • Similarly, the more information brought to the table in terms of instrumentation and staff, the better the building’s HVAC system can be optimized. Without a comprehensive equipment list early in the project, engineers will make a conservative estimate, leading to potentially excess spending on unnecessarily large systems and operational inefficiency.
  • Capturing and reusing heat generated in the lab is a huge opportunity that can significantly reduce heating loads, especially in cold climates.
  • Getting to net-zero energy in a lab environment is difficult, but geothermal and solar systems offer the opportunity to further drive down energy use and electrify energy sources. With systems like these in place, it is possible to drive energy use intensity (EUI) down to approximately 100 kBtu/sf/yr or less, compared to approximately 300-400 kBtu/sf/yr for facilities with traditional mechanical systems.

5. Design for Sensitive Environments

Increasingly sensitive testing requires sensitively designed lab environments. Forever chemicals like PFAS/PFOS require extra consideration during the material selection and construction process to reduce contaminants in sensitive environments.

  • As instrumentation improves, testing processes can detect contamination levels in the parts-per-trillion range. Setting up clean lab suites for these kinds of sensitive instruments has become vital, as even minimal background contamination can lead to inaccurate testing.
  • Unidirectional workflows, separation of clean and dirty processes, and dedicated spaces for sensitive instrumentation are becoming more common to address this.

6. Doing More With Less

It’s no surprise that construction costs are rising rapidly – a laboratory project might be 50-75% more expensive today than a similar project pre-COVID due to workforce shortages and increasing labor, raw material, and transportation costs.

  • Although design teams can consider construction types, MEP systems, and interior finishes with a variety of price points, optimizing a building’s footprint is the most effective cost-control method available. 
    Optimization requires an early understanding of space program, workflows, adjacencies, and instrumentation needs, to give the design team and client confidence the space allocated will meet functional needs. 

7. Selecting a Site

Selecting a location for a new laboratory facility can go beyond practicalities such as infrastructure and zoning, bringing new possibilities for enhanced operations now and in the future.

  • Clients are seeing site selection conversations as opportunities to improve collaboration with other agencies and departments, as well as better access shared resources.
  • Because lab buildings are typically expected to have a long lifespan, site planning for expansions and program co-location minimizes disruptions down the line.

8. Engaging the Public

  • Many clients are seeing the advantages of more prominent, public-facing sites, rather than hiding labs away in industrial parks.
  • Allowing public access requires facilities to be designed for a range of visitors, from an elementary school field trip to community tours.
  • Circulation systems must be carefully planned to avoid guests interrupting or contaminating laboratory processes.

As the industry continues to see fast-paced change, organizations are seeking facilities that not only support cutting-edge research but also foster a positive, resilient, and energy-efficient environment. By equipping companies with the right tools, customized to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future, innovation can remain at the forefront.

In Memoriam: Chuck Wahlberg

Chuck Wahlberg passed away on July 8, 2024, at the age of 101. His legacy as an architect, mentor, leader, and colleague will long be remembered through his lasting impact on our work.

In 1954, Chuck joined the developing firm that would soon become BWBR, hired by Milt Bergstedt (the first “B” in BWBR). Just five years later, Wahlberg was named a principal, becoming one of the four names that denote the company today.

Best known for designing banks and commercial buildings, he was recognized for bringing substantial people skills to the firm, serving as a one-man human resources department for many years. As the firm was finding its footing, Chuck recognized the importance of investing in staff, marketing for work, and building strong relationships with clients – transforming BWBR for the better.

“Chuck was really important to the firm historically in that he had the personality and the professionalism that appealed to people,” says Wil Johnson, who was hired by Chuck when there were only about a dozen people at the firm. Chuck would later appoint him as BWBR’s first marketing director. “He hired dozens and dozens of people, and a lot of them spent their whole careers [at the firm].”

Responsible for hiring nearly every employee over 25 years, including those who would later become leaders, Chuck played a critical role in shaping the culture that still defines BWBR today. The third president in our 100-year history, his leadership in the 1970s solidified the firm as a budding business and introduced traditions that still stand decades later.

“Chuck Wahlberg was my teacher, helper, and friend throughout my architecture career,” says Jay Sleiter, former principal and alumni who briefly led a Hudson, Wis. office with Chuck in 1981. “All of the BWBR founders are gone, but all of us are thankful for them.”

Beyond his incredible contributions to both BWBR and the communities shaped by his design work, our team is grateful for his long-standing passion for the firm’s people and success. He will be greatly missed.